Empirical
evidence has repeatedly demonstrated that countries do not convergence
to the same level of development, they may diverge, and multiple equilibriums
are possible. The existence of poverty traps has been offered as one
explanation for these different experiences. Poverty traps are observable
at the sub-national level, resulting in marginal territories within
a country, ghettos within a city, or even at the individual level.
This question is most often analysed at the macroeconomic level, and
it has nourished a rich and long lasting body of both theoretical and
empirical literature. Similar bodies of literature have emerged at intermediate
and micro levels, e.g., models of economic growth with multiple steady
state equilibriums, or of nonlinearities in asset accumulation pathways,
as well as numerous variants of the new economic geography explaining
regional core-periphery divergences. The implications of these different
explanations are far from trivial. They can contribute to the design
of social policies, some of which may fail to eradicate poverty if the
reasons why some individuals are trapped in poverty are not clearly
identified. They contribute to our analytical understanding of why globalization
does not benefit everybody everywhere, and can immiserate some populations.
Recent evidence highlights that a broader understanding of the causes
for entrapment in poverty is needed. For instance, governance issues,
rent seeking, and political economy issues may create a vicious circle
where high logistics costs, low traded volumes, capture of rents in
services, and increasing marginalization reinforce each other. At the
microeconomic level, the lack of human capital has always been identified
as one of the main obstacle to convergence. Further, in the case of
least developed countries, a recent and fruitful strand of the literature
shifts the focus to health issues. Recurrent and widespread diseases
like malaria, HIV/AIDS, as well as neglected diseases such as diarrheas
and respiratory diseases, are shown to alter dramatically children's
cognitive capacities. This alteration has permanent effects, which affect
the quantity/quality of school performance at the macro-level.